My contention is that the class of cases we're talking about involve two subsets. One is cases where there's a lack of due process, and that was the basis upon which Mr. Kenney intervened in the case I cited. In fact, he said publicly that it was the basis of his intervention. Also, there are cases that involve that lack, or not necessarily that, and a human rights abuse. Both categories of cases are equally egregious, in my view, and equally invite intervention on the part of the Canadian government.
