Mr. Chair, thank you very much for the nomination, but I understand that there's a bit of a convention with respect to these things.
We made great efforts during this Parliament, before prorogation, to ensure that the four parties were represented on all the committees—including the Canada-China committee, which is the case. That hasn't been accepted, but there's nothing to stop us, as a committee, from electing three vice-chairs. Normally, it would be Mr. Bergeron, and I don't want to take a position that would otherwise go to Mr. Bergeron, given the convention that's been operating in the House.
I would be very happy if we held with the tradition of the Canada-China committee and had a vice-chair from each party. It works well, and in fact it's important, as we've seen in other committees. Members who are vice-chairs make a contribution. We've seen it in the public safety committee, for example, and our members have been playing leading roles in committees, both in terms of helping set the agenda and in working collaboratively with the other parties in this minority Parliament.
With great respect and appreciation, I thank you for the nomination, but I would ask Mr. Bergeron what he would have to say about that. I don't think I will take the place of Mr. Bergeron in this discussion, but I will give him the opportunity to have a word.