Thank you.
I will start by saying first of all that I appreciate all the interventions of my colleagues.
First, Mr. Bergeron, I agree that the word “vulnerability” could be replaced in terms of wherever we have “fragile”. That's not a problem. Also, for the countries that are listed, I believe you recommended “including, but not limited to” so that we're not limited to those countries.
I'm not sure if I agree with the extremely narrow focus that Mr. Genuis has provided, but I do agree with regard to Mr. Chong's amendments that I'm not sure if those are amendments. I think we would be moving to a motion that he could propose after we dispose of my motion.
I'm just trying to make up my mind as to whether I would withdraw this motion. I guess I need to hear from Mr. Bergeron if he's in agreement, because I don't know if his motion takes.... If I withdraw my motion, then there's no longer an amendment. Would we then be moving to Mr. Bergeron's motion, which he read into the record a little while ago, or would we not be moving to that? Otherwise, would he also be willing to withdraw it and send it to subcommittee? I need clarification on that before I can really make a decision.
I also wanted to say that it seems that through this process we will all be sending a lot of different notices of motion to the subcommittee. I also wanted to clarify that anything that gets decided at the subcommittee is not really a final decision: It would then come back to the whole committee to dispose of, vote on and make the final decision on. Is that correct?