As I said, I'm predisposed to do it. My dilemma is that there's an interpretive nature to something being consistent with something.
Mr. Harris, absolutely we can do this. I think we should have something that is consistent, but I don't know how you measure that: Something is consistent in the eyes of whom? I just want it on the record that it's a very difficult thing to determine whether something is consistent with an international agreement, because that would have to be adjudicated in some way.
That said, I'm fine to go with this and then move on, because I don't think it's a big issue.