That satisfies me on that.
I am concerned about the idea of requiring states to reassess an existing permit when new information becomes available. In October of 2019, when Canada suspended the arms export permits to Turkey—just the granting of new ones, as you pointed out, but not interfering with existing permits—we were told that there were already 15 permits in existence, covering as many as 60 cameras, including replacements if they happened to be damaged. That wasn't interfered with at all.
It appears that these cameras were still being exported, even after the further suspension in April 2020 of arms exports to Turkey, under the previously granted permits.
Can I ask you whether that in itself would be a violation of the Arms Trade Treaty per se, as opposed to Canadian law in particular?
I would direct that to anybody who wishes to answer.