I just wanted to add to the motion itself. I think it speaks for itself, and the committee passed a similar motion recently upon delivery of the previous documents. We were concerned, of course, that the only exception to our motion made on October 29 was related to cabinet confidentiality.
Instead, we got documents which were redacted beyond that purposely by Global Affairs Canada, which spelled out what forms of redaction they used there, which seemed to be, by the advice given to the committee, similar to the ATIP kinds of exclusions that would be made. The documents essentially were clearly available to the public, and the committee agreed to release them before. I think we can confirm—perhaps the clerk can help us on that—that these particular sets of documents were also following the same mechanism to ensure that the documents were expected to be made public.