I agree with my colleague Mr. Chong. I love the fact that we could be looking at exposing a lot of human rights abuses and so forth. We know the world is full of that. In some ways it's way too broad. I don't know where you would even start, because I think there are probably human rights violations in almost every nation in the world if you started drilling down. It is far too broad.
It's very subjective when you talk about right-wing extremists. I'll give you an example. I was just looking at the Toronto Star today. This columnist opined the following:
In truth, the vast majority of mainstream media leans to the right. That includes the Globe and Mail, National Post and other Postmedia newspapers, the Toronto Sun and other Sun papers across Canada, CTV, Global TV and a slew of radio talk shows.
In this person's opinion, all mainstream media appears to be right-wing. I think you would get a pretty good argument from most Conservatives that this is not true.
I agree with Mr. Chong that we should take out the “right-wing” reference and talk about “ideologically motivated”, perhaps, and make it as broad a study as possible.
Thanks.