It's not exactly the best procedure, but I think it would work for us informally if we could.... I've talked to a few of you, and we think Mr. Bergeron came up with a good subamendment to the amendment I had made to the motion that was made by Mr. Harris with Ms. McPherson. We would propose that we move fairly quickly to voting on the subamendment made by Mr. Bergeron, which would then nullify the amendment that I had made, and then I think we would have a motion as amended by the subamendment that we might all be able to live with, and we would be happy to proceed that way.
It's not that we're tired of talking about the motion, but we're tired of talking about the motion. Mr. Bergeron presented a very good solution, and it had two weeks to germinate, and I think that would be a great way forward.