I would just say that we're talking about two different things.
I think, Ms. McPherson, you're talking about Standing Order 106(4), which is when you have four members call a meeting. The agreement was that for the use of S. O. 106(4), there would be at least two parties.
This motion is for meetings without quorum. With meetings without quorum, there's not a lot of risk of surprises or magic happening at them because, if I understand this correctly, meetings without quorum would be only to receive evidence. You can't have motions moved. We can't compel someone to testify. It's just for the purpose of being able to have a meeting to receive evidence, so I don't think there's much risk of shenanigans if we just pass it as is. That's my thought.