Let's give that a second to see if we can fix the interpretation. It's a technical question.
Is it working now as it should? It is. Okay.
Mr. Oliphant, let me just repeat this. In terms of what you just said with respect to the motion brought forward by Mr. Chong, I'm suggesting that it may be framed as an amendment to then supersede Mr. Chong's motion, which is still on the floor. I read it as a parallel motion, but technically it would have to be an amendment to Mr. Chong's.