As I've maybe said previously, I don't know whether that's an answer to my question. You're saying that the delays allowed misinformation to set in, but I'm sharing that it was clearly information, not misinformation, which is that Canada is choosing to distribute vaccines that are not recommended for use in Canada, and that some proportion—and we'll find out when you follow up with the written answer—of what's coming from other countries may be vaccines that aren't even approved, let alone recommended, here in Canada.
Is it not logical to wonder that people who are looking at that and saying, “People in Canada are being encouraged to choose other alternatives, and yet Canada is sending this to us” might contribute to hesitancy in terms of uptake, at least until other kinds of vaccines are available?