I would say a couple of things to this. The first is that I would note that the U.S. has had the benefit of having this interdiction in place since 1930, so it's had a number of decades to work through operational challenges and to ensure that structures, systems and funding are put in place to effectively do it. As I noted, Canada is only the second country in the world to introduce such a ban, and we are working closely with the U.S. in working through what the best practices are and how this can be effectively operationalized.
The other piece that I would note is that the U.S. does have a different evidentiary threshold for the U.S. Customs and Border Protection service versus the Canada Border Services Agency, and that does speak to the withhold-and-release order system that the U.S. uses for the interdiction of the goods versus the approach that the Canada Border Services Agency has to comply with.
I think the critical piece to this is the length of time that the U.S. has had to be able to put this in place, to resource it and to bring it up to scale. We know that there are other countries that are interested in legislation like this. They have been consulting with us and recognize the complexity, scale and scope of trying to introduce something of this nature as well. It will take a bit of time to be able to operationalize it to its full effect.