This is a complicated question, in the sense that attaching conditions to the recognition of a state is not unheard of. It's something that's been done multiple times.
I think the reason I was being cautious is that I believe that the two-state solution is the only possible solution. The reason I believe that is that I believe that Palestinian nationalism and Jewish nationalism are two sides of the same coin. They are both national movements that aspire to self-determination. In that sense, a two-state solution is the only answer.
I think what is unfortunate is the fact that we're having these conversations following October 7, which opens the door to all these kinds of objections on the motivation and on whether this makes recognition look like a cave-in to terrorism. Why does that matter? If we know that Canada wants to recognize Palestine, we shouldn't really care about the fact that it's—
I'm sorry.