I can't speak to the specifics, given that we don't have the intelligence around the cases, let's say. I've been asked a number of times if this would have sped up the case of the two Michaels, or any such cases. I think the answer is that if I were to say yes, it would be untruthful, but I do think that it adds, again, tools in the arsenal to be able to potentially do it faster.
We do have many examples from the U.S., and obviously some interest from Australia. Their Senate is studying a version of this, based on this bill, to eventually take to the Australian parliament. We do know that our allies are interested and we do know that there's been success in the U.S., particularly in the rewards for justice program.
I don't think anybody can argue.... I'm sure that you'll hear from witnesses in this short study on this bill who will tell you that the family aspect of it is probably the most horrific part of any of this. You don't just take a country hostage by policy and you don't just take the hostage; you take the entire circle around that person, where they are living and breathing this on a daily basis. Unfortunately, over the last year, I've talked to many, many families who are in that position and who see their government as acting inadequately on it.