Thank you very much for your question. It's a slightly difficult one to answer, because you've asked me about arbitrary detentions and hostage-takings—both—and I think the answers would be slightly different.
Where arbitrary detentions are concerned, it would be helpful for families to have greater clarity about whether their case is an arbitrary detention. One thing that has been helpful south of the border is the Levinson act criteria, which set out what constitutes a wrongful detention in American terminology. However, let's face it, the United States did not have a good record in hostage-taking resolution before 2015. Indeed, they're still probably not doing terribly well in bringing home hostages who are taken by terrorists. They're a target for that.
The Five Eyes partners—and I think Robert Fowler was alluding to this—also have a poor record. That's probably because of the policy on no concessions to terrorists. I'm not advocating that this should change, but that is a fact and we have to recognize it. It means that other tools should be looked at. As you've said—and I would agree—the tools in this legislation are not the right ones.
The accountability of the government to the families and—