Yes, I quoted from barrister Amal Clooney. She found as part of a large study that there was an “apparent reticence”—those were the words she used—to impose targeted sanctions. She did a study looking at the U.K., Canada, the U.S. and the EU, I believe, and found that particularly in cases of arbitrary detention of journalists, targeted sanctions were not used in response—Magnitsky acts and other current tools.
That's why this bill, in my opinion, is so important. It provides, without anything mandatory related to sanctions, a very clear direction that targeted sanctions can be used for this purpose.