I'd reiterate what I said earlier about how there's a growing body of research and studies that question whether unilateral sanctions are effective. In this case, if we were to look at potential ways to improve this legislation, it's modelled in large part on Canada's Magnitsky law and is targeted specifically to individuals. If we were to look at sanctions, having targeted sanctions in regard to specific individuals, not entire entities, entire states or entire governments, would allow some form of protection, although we're still fairly critical of that.
Beyond that, there's a concern, as you said, that these sanctions can be levied if the Governor in Council is of that opinion. We believe that to improve this, some form of judicial safeguard could be put in place so it would have to be reviewed judicially within a certain amount of time if it's not pre-authorized by a judge. Of course, that also runs into the question that's been raised about the discretion of government and ministers in these types of cases. It raises the question of whether there is a conflict there between a judicial authorization and ministerial discretion to act on these issues.
All those points make it incredibly difficult to find clear ways to amend this legislation so that it would be workable to achieve its goals.