Can I speak further to that point of order?
I will be very clear that I heard the point of order. We didn't get to add to the point of order that Mr. Bergeron made.
With respect to the objects of the bill, the concerns raised by the author of the bill and the concerns raised by a couple of the witnesses we heard, I will say that we have heard this. I think that we could benefit from a concurrence debate on a deemed-reported bill. However, we would still be very loath to not listen to the expert witnesses who looked at both the lack of a need for such a bill and also the danger in this particular bill.
We will be voting no on these, but then I will be presenting such a motion under Standing Order 97.1 that then has a process, which I will explain at the next point.
Thank you.