I have a point of order.
I just want to clarify whether that was a subamendment or not, because it was presented sort of as a subamendment. We don't have such a thing as consent of the mover of an amendment to adopt it in committee. Under the Standing Orders, it would have to have been a subamendment, because we can't simply turn to a mover to suggest that they agree and that it would be okay. That is not parliamentary procedure.
I just need clarification. If it was a subamendment, then we should vote on it. If it's withdrawn or if it was not a subamendment and was a conversation point, that's a little different.
It was clearly presented as a subamendment, but I didn't hear the chair refer to it as a subamendment.