Mr. Chair, I'm seeking further clarification.
Your ruling seems to me to be that the election of the chair is not a substantive matter, but a motion to adjourn is a substantive matter if it is attached to a condition.
Could you maybe explain a little more to the committee to help our understanding about why you would deem that the election of the chair is not a substantive matter but that the adjournment motion is a substantive matter? I think it might be helpful for those who are trying to reconcile the conflicting precedents in the future.