Okay.
I will very briefly say that it's our view that the language around “completion of the committee's studies” is important. I don't know if one can sub-sub. I'm happy to discuss it. I'm not wedded to the particular language of the original amendment, but our view is that the completion of the studies on Ukraine, vaccine equity and Taiwan is important.
Insofar as the subamendment removes the requirement that this work be completed.... I understand Mr. Bergeron's points with respect to Taiwan, and maybe there's a case for a subamendment that carves out the Taiwan piece in some particular way. However, insofar as the revised amendments, it now says that the other work would not have to be completed prior to proceeding to this study. That's not consistent with our position.
I'll leave my comments there for now.