Mr. Chair, this is the third attempt by Mr. Genuis to disrupt the meeting and disrespect your ruling as the chair. He has parliamentary privilege to challenge the ruling. That challenge may be made, and there's a process for it to be made. It will be voted on immediately and then we can proceed to the business.
My understanding is that there was a motion on the floor to do a future study. There's an amendment, which was not challenged. Mr. Spengemann, as chair, did not rule on it. He allowed it, so it wasn't a case of procedure that you are changing. It's the first time a point of order has been raised on whether that was a substantive or dilatory motion. The point of order has been raised. You have ruled on it.
I would ask us now that we either proceed to the original motion that was raised or have the chair's ruling challenged.