I'd like to build on what my colleague Mr. Bergeron said.
I know how important this is, but this committee has already held four meetings on the turbine study. That's quite a few meetings. Let's face it: Ukraine has moved on from the turbines. It's now undertaken a counter‑offensive. It needs weapons and support. Things have changed considerably since the summer. As Mr. Genuis said this morning, 300,000 Russian reservists are going to be deployed and there's now reference to nuclear weapons. This requires our attention. I therefore move that we go back to our Ukraine study. It's unfortunate that we still haven't produced a report after several months spent working on it. We need to put some flesh on the bones for that study.
I'd also like to tell my Conservative colleagues that I respect their position. They clearly don't support our government's decision. We don't need another four meetings to talk about it. They have quite clearly stated their position. They can put it in writing if they wish, but our committee needs to address the problems we're seeing around the world right now, not only in Ukraine, but also in Haiti and along the Armenia‑Azerbaijan border, as we've just heard. We have a great deal of work to do, and I feel this motion is being used to play politics.
Therefore, I'm asking my colleagues to consider going back to the wider study on Ukraine so that we can finish it, produce a report and continue our work.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.