Thank you very much.
Thanks for the update.
As you well know, talks under the Minsk process have been going on with regard to Azerbaijan and Armenia. However, as we well know, when the 2020 agreement was broken, Russia played a huge role in that. Given that Russia has a defence agreement with Armenia and given that Azerbaijan and Turkey have been closely aligned—and we know the long-standing geopolitical history between Turkey and Armenia—should either of those two groups be involved in this kind of negotiation? That's my first question. Should we not just go back to the OSCE Minsk process and get this done by three so-called neutral groups, like France, the United States and the United Kingdom? Should that be what we're talking about?
I ask because this was a very short-lived 2020 ceasefire, and the 2,000 troops that Russia was going to be putting in there to make sure that peace was being kept and that the corridors were kept open actually didn't work, because Russia is now totally distracted by their war in Ukraine. What do you see as a process to move this agenda forward? There has to be some way.
I know that the European Council and the European Commission have been involved, but in theory, this has always been under the OSCE agreements and process. What do you see as the best way to talk about a ceasefire, to deal with looking at a process and to deal with looking at certain agreements, given the history with Russia and Armenia, the history with Turkey and Azerbaijan and the failed 2020 agreement?