Thank you, Chair.
I would underline briefly that I think the flexibility members are looking for in whether there are two or three meetings, exactly when those meetings happen and how the clerk will schedule them...all of that is well captured in the original motion that Mr. Bergeron put forward. It entails a maximum of three meetings, but not necessarily three meetings. It includes the flexibility already. I would suggest that the committee simply pass the motion and let the clerk do her work from there.
Given that the committee is planning on hearing from the diplomatic representatives of Armenia and Azerbaijan under the rubric of the pre-existing study, I think the compromise Mr. Bergeron has proposed is reasonable as well.
In any event, what the motion says is that we're going to do this quickly and we're going to get the hearings done before the end of the first sitting week, with however many within that framework it makes sense to have. The motion establishes that flexibility, so I'm in support of what Mr. Bergeron said.
I think we're probably ready.