I have a point of order.
Mr. Chair, the motion that's put forward says that it's an urgent matter. The expiration of the gas turbine sanction waiver is January 5, which is under 29 days. Repairing or not repairing a turbine for a pipeline that has blown apart is, I think, less important than a study of the reproductive rights of women.
If the Conservative Party, members of the Conservative Party or this member thinks that the repair or non-repair of a blown up pipeline thousands of miles away that has a permit expiring in less than four weeks is more important than the reproductive rights of women, I think they should bring witnesses to that effect and say that officially, rather than going around and about in this long way to say that. Just be blatant and say that we're against sexual reproductive rights of women and that we don't want to study it.
I don't know why we need to go on a diatribe to belittle this while we have witnesses here. We've had a motion that was put forward in June. We have opposition parties and a governing party all wanting this. In fact, I think 10 out of 11—if I'm right—members have approved this study, so I think this is very irrelevant. The argument that it's urgent is also irrelevant, as I just said. There is no pipeline to repair. The waiver that was given is expiring in four weeks. In fact, if we did a study right now, it would probably not be published until the waiver is already done.
I think that we should go on to committee business and that this proposed motion should be put out of order.