Yes, it is.
What Ziad is saying is very true. If we've already passed the motion, why are we having this debate? If it's an amendment that they want to make to the motion, what they have to go through is proposing an amendment to go from the suggested witnesses to something other than that.
I would ask Mr. Bergeron to guide us, though, with regard to the witnesses he has picked out. What does he think is the appropriate amount of time we should have them in front of the committee, so that they don't get shortchanged if we end up adding more witnesses to the list?