On a point of order, I believe that Mr. Genuis was debating, in the point of order, about not responding to the point of order, so I think on that side there's a matter of debate going on that could be ruled out of order as well. He's engaging in substantive conversation as opposed to really addressing.... He has every right to say something is not a point of order, which is a point of order, I would say. However, I'm making a point of order because he does not have the right to engage in a debate on substantive issues when something is raised as a point of order, even if it's ruled by you, Chair, not to be a point of order, and you have every right to rule that it is not a point of order.
On December 7th, 2022. See this statement in context.