Mr. Chair, I would like to clarify that the meeting next Tuesday has nothing to do with this motion. It was already scheduled by the committee to discuss the global geopolitical situation.
Here is my question. The consensus we have reached is that we should try to have two meetings on the situation in the Lachin corridor, but there are members who want to invite other witnesses, and that is what we have adopted. Because time is limited, we may have to hold up to three meetings to hear all the witnesses you will be asked to invite. The motion, as passed, allows us to have a third meeting if necessary. We may not need it, but we don't know yet how many witnesses the parties will propose. Therefore, you have this buffer of a meeting that you can add to the schedule to complete the Lachin corridor study, depending on the list of witnesses that will be submitted to you this Friday.
Have I clearly understood what we have in front of us?