Thank you.
You raised a very important general question—that international law should also be applicable to Artsakh. Despite those Security Council resolutions that were adopted during the war with the sole purpose of stopping that act of aggression against Artsakh by Azerbaijan, they were not respected by Azerbaijan itself. Azerbaijan, in violation of all those resolutions, resumed attacks against Artsakh. We have to be clear on that. Otherwise, there will be no need to reiterate the general vision of the peaceful resolution of this conflict by so many resolutions.
We want Azerbaijan to adhere to the rest of the UN charter. The fundamental thing there is the right to self-determination. People have a right to self-determination. Self-determination is the right that has provided the formation of the treaty and much of the entire political map today. That is a process that is inalienable. It's irresistible, if you wish.
We also want to say that we deserve that right, because we did not fail in our quest for independence. We turned into a much more democratic country, especially if you compare it with the autocracy in Azerbaijan.
As of now, we want Azerbaijan to adhere to the UN charter, the same way they always put forward as the argument in their favour, and end the blockade, which violates any UN article and violates the major conventions to which Azerbaijan is a co-signatory; to respect human rights; to respect international law; and to take these discussions, including political discussions, over the whole set of issues into a political field. Why should kids die while Azerbaijan is feeling just fine and referring to UN resolutions adopted 30 years ago?
No. We want Azerbaijan to behave internationally, which would be respect towards international law, towards the country's commitments to behave in a predictable political manner and towards their own people, who also deserve rights. What we see is autocracy—