Thank you, Mr. Chair.
Your Excellency, I would like to follow up on the discussion we had about Ms. Vartanyan’s testimony.
I think the elephant in the room is the corridor to Nakhchivan. Last week, some testimony suggested that peace negotiations did not seem to be going well on the Nakhchivan corridor, even though Armenia did commit to considering the possibility of creating such a corridor. Blocking the Lachin corridor was intended to pressure Armenia into concluding negotiations on the corridor to Nakhchivan. That led another witness to tell us that we were comparing apples and oranges, because Nakhchivan is not a landlocked territory. It’s in direct contact with Turkey, while Nagorno-Karabakh is landlocked territory inside Azerbaijan.
What do you think of this kind of testimony?