Yes. Thank you for the question.
The challenge is that, when you've made commitments in advance to a multi-year program, you have already identified where you want to respond and what interventions in particular you want to pursue. You make commitments. You source. You procure. Then an earthquake hits. You've already spent some of the money. Now you have to pivot quickly, even where you have available funds, to respond.
I think the point is that the needs in a context like Syria particularly, where you've already had 12 years of civil war, where you already have 4.1 million people needing aid, where you have successive UN requests, underfunded significantly, there's nowhere near enough in terms of using previous commitments to respond to the new challenges. I think the scope and scale are beyond what many expected, and we need to do more.
Thank you for that preoccupation.