I'm going to pick up on your last point. Is this a bit of trading back and forth? I'm aware that the Humanitarian Coalition, also through their members, has boots on the ground and has been pre-vetted as an organization that's worthy of matching. To the point in your opening statement, you talked about how Canada was already partnering with numerous other agreements with the Red Cross. The matching component is to leverage Canadian support. Again, as my colleague has stated, that support exists across a wider variety of organizations. I can get into Charity Intelligence's evaluations of them.
Can you talk to me about the vetting process or the decision-making process? Why is it only the Red Cross?