I'm sorry.
Within Canadian court proceedings—for example, in the immigration context and other contexts—there is a possibility to see recognitions of genocide. There might be other domestic legal findings to point to beyond just the statement of Parliament.
The main concern around the determination by the House of Commons is not that it's not valid. It's very valid, and it's a strong statement. I think my colleague talked about the importance of the government. It's more about the process that's followed to make that statement. Frequently, those statements would then lead to, for example, sanctions or other things that follow, and have additional checks and balances, rights to responses and things that might not be present in the parliamentary process when dealing with a foreign entity.
In terms of your—