Thank you very much for the question.
When Canada enacted our domestic legislation, the Prohibiting Cluster Munitions Act, the clause related to prohibiting aiding and abetting, which I'm sure you're familiar with, was seen as covering the issue of investments. You rightly point out that different countries have different legislation in terms of how to implement that.
I won't comment specifically on the legislation of other countries, because I cannot speak to that with any degree of authority. What I would say in relation to indirect investments is that a really important element of it is intent and how you would determine or prove that the individual investor or entity has that intent.
As my colleague said, we know that the bill is well-intentioned. We just want to make sure that, at the end of the day, it is enforceable, and that we're not holding Canadians criminally liable, for example, pension fund holders who may unwittingly hold investments related to cluster munitions.