Yes. We're actually trying to have it both ways. On one hand, we claim that our country is a state party in good standing, fully compliant with the convention, yet we continue to have in the act a list of exceptions.
As I say, it goes beyond aiding and abetting. There is a section of that wider section that actually enables the Canadian commander of the multinational force to order, authorize or direct the use of cluster munitions by non-party state forces—not by Canadians but by others. In this case, we are the author of the order, and non-party states become our agents. That is in no way consistent with what we negotiated in a 15-month period, 15 years ago now.