Yes. Both amendments would be agreeable to me.
I don't see why there cannot be a human rights strategy from the government. We have seen a lot of different statements of concern and mandate letters, etc., from the government, without a solid human rights strategy. I think that would be helpful, especially for NGOs like Hong Kong Watch that are advocating for human rights.
As for the amendment for the definition of “prisoner of conscience”, I believe that would be helpful. It would definitely add more clarity to how the bill is to be applied.