On that point of order, it would seem to me that an understanding of the rules would be that if the House has adopted the bill at second reading and the committee does its work, amendments at report stage are generally, in my experience, restricted to amending the amendments that were made at committee, as opposed to that.
There are other avenues, I would think, that could be done.
My sense is that if the chair were overruled and this was put in order, we may find a way in this committee to pull it back into scope and have it stand.
Am I being a little cryptic? I'm trying not to be cryptic.