Thank you, Mr. Chair.
I have a thousand and one questions about the new paragraph 6.1(c) proposed in amendment CPC‑4.3. When I look at it, I don't find it clear. I think our officials had the same concern with the part talking about “certain projects of a company that produces, sells or distributes cluster munitions”.
As I understand it, if a company produces, sells and distributes cluster munitions, but also funds other projects, there would be agreement on funding those other projects. The reason I am wondering about this is, first of all, because “certain projects” is not defined. It's also because these companies are communicating vessels. There are different projects.
If you are funding a project that is not related to cluster munitions, but the company's premises, resources and equipment are communicating vessels, then you are indirectly funding the production, sale and distribution of cluster munitions. The same people are working in the same place. In one way or another, we risk funding these projects, since they are communicating vessels. We don't want that.
I would like my Conservative colleagues to explain to me whether or not my concerns are justified.