I'm going to ask you, or whoever, to comment perhaps on the direction of planning. Three commitments were made in 2017 for three areas of spending, with 15% of the spending targeted toward gender-targeted, 80% toward gender-integrated and then 5% for infrastructure.
Without the lack of outcomes as driving those spending splits and with the information systems, can you comment on the direction of the thought process? Or, am I getting this all wrong and the splits—the 15%, the 80% and the 5%—weren't the drivers of the projects? Were they the outcome of projects and targets? Do you understand my question? Is it going in this direction and we didn't have outcomes, or did we start with our goals and work backwards to what money we spent?
I note that the Auditor General.... Only two of the three pillars of the spending were met. I'm not saying that we spend money for spending money's sake, but we're after outcomes here.