Mr. Chair, I believe there are sufficient checks and balances through the due process that the individual is afforded, by the analysis that is undertaken by Global Affairs. Certainly, thereafter, if there's any question about how that discretion was exercised by officials, and then under IRPA, they can then seek judicial review before the Federal Court.
I would point out that these individual cases are taken very seriously by Global Affairs. Listing somebody under SEMA is not a trivial thing. Attention and care are given to examining the facts on the merits. That is because we recognize what's at stake for those individuals. Being rendered inadmissible is a serious thing. Therefore, we have put in place the appropriate checks and balances in the process prior to sanctioning an individual under SEMA and, by extension, rendering them inadmissible once this provision becomes law.