I think we just have to follow the recommendations put forward by Mario and the CBA and me, just to define the terminology so that we're targeting individuals. Once we go to the proposed 35.1(1), I've stated that it should be defined, as far as we believe it should be worded, as foreign nationals inadmissible for sanctions on grounds of “violating human or international rights”. This rejoins the term back to what it currently is and takes away the broadness, ensuring that we're not casting a big net. Hopefully that will push it forward.
Also, I would probably push the question toward my colleagues as well.