I will make one comment, and then, if I may, Mr. Chair, turn to my colleague, Scott Nesbitt.
With respect to the definitional issues, the one thing that is very important to note is that any time there's a definition in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that doesn't perfectly align with the enabling sanction-imposing statute, you have imposed a new test for immigration officials to apply, which somewhat undermines the intent of this bill.
The intent of this bill is to align sanctions-issuing provisions with immigration inadmissibility-issuing provisions. If you impose any definitional issues, or any definitions that don't perfectly mirror those statutes, you're introducing greater complexity and an extra administrative decision for immigration officials, which wouldn't be the case if the definitions perfectly aligned amongst all of those statutes.