In principle, it's a similar scenario. As I mentioned before, the multilateral sanctions under paragraph 35(1)(c) of the IRPA, which reference country and individual, can be imposed under the Special Economic Measures Act, in addition to the United Nations Act and any other act that allows Canada to act in concert with an association of states.
By importing a definition from only the Special Economic Measures Act and not ensuring that same definition applies in all of the other sanctions-issuing legislation, it creates additional complexity and additional tests. It could create a lack of coordination from an inadmissibility perspective, rather than a coordinating effect as intended by the proposed amendment.