Thank you for the question.
Complementing what Alain said, I think Syria is a good example of where we see the challenges that come up with private sector de-risking and those issues we mentioned in our opening statement with banks, suppliers and logistics companies that we rely upon to carry out our work. That's because in Syria, you have a situation where you have numerous overlapping sanctions regimes and counterterrorism regulations for many countries that are in place, and that leads to a lot of confusion about what's allowed and what's not allowed and, if there are humanitarian carve-outs in place, what can be supported and when. What we see is that this results in delays for humanitarian organizations like the ICRC in being able to procure items that are desperately needed for a humanitarian response, and to have funding sent to the country and our offices to be able to facilitate our activities.
Second, this also brings up the point that we're in a dynamic situation of a protracted conflict that can have various emergency situations also arise, and it shows that conflicts can evolve and change. When it comes to humanitarian carve-outs, it really represents the need to ensure that carve-outs capture the breadth of humanitarian activities that can take place in such situations, responding to both protracted conflicts and those emergency situations.