Absolutely. Thank you very much.
Echoing the comments of my colleagues, I will build on what Austin said. Where we have experienced the impact of sanctions is that the very people we're concerned about protecting.... It's the civilian population that is really at the hands of those individuals—the designated groups, the designated individuals and the governments themselves. The civilian population is greatly impacted by those same people. What we are speaking about when it comes to that notion of a carve-out is not to run interference at all with the sanctions, working toward the end they are aspiring to, but rather to create a space for humanitarian organizations and, exactly as my colleague Austin said, to be able to do so in a timely manner.
I can give an example. We've had colleagues go to work in the response to Syria and, as Austin mentioned, in addition to the already very difficult task of figuring out who needs what and organizing all of the goods, they had to put aside time in order to navigate every regime internationally that applied to that particular situation.
When there is a clear carve-out—