There are two key points on this.
The first is a regulatory point. The world does need to regulate vulture funds better. Actually, I did a book on hedge funds quite recently, and one of the issues was vulture funds. Until those are regulated, there's a structural problem.
The other point about it is that some countries are not going to be viable as places to live, and this is about more than food production. Some parts of countries are not going to be viable as places to live. Again, this transcends food production. Nobody has ever moved a megacity, but if you speak to climatographers, they'll say that you may have to move Delhi; you may have to move Beijing, and you may even have to move LA. Of course, once you have those kinds of big movements of people, even within countries, that changes fundamentally the basis of food production, and it challenges the basis of food supply, so there are big, structural things.
There are two things to take away. The first is the regulation of vulture funds, in terms of debt, particularly in the age of high interest rates. The second is what to plan for the future about some countries not being viable anymore and some megacities not being viable anymore.