Thanks so much for the question.
As you can imagine, I've given this a lot of thought. I can also understand the concern of some about the enormous investment of time required to do a systematic foreign policy review, and I've heard our ambassadors and civil servants say we need to move beyond talking about foreign policy and actually do something about it, and this would just mire us in another internal exercise.
The counter to that is that the world has shifted so much and we seem to be careening from event to event without an overarching framework. While there were some limitations to the Indo-Pacific strategy, I think it did try to provide that framework within which specific decisions could be made. We should also give some consideration to what other states have done and how other states have demonstrated to us how foreign policy change is possible. We keep—