If human rights violations have been.... It's a war, at the end of the day, and they can happen on both sides. You said you don't have any evidence on that at this point in time. It's not an easy decision to make. However, you said earlier that you have a process going to be able to determine that so that you can go down the road to the ICC or take both sides to the ICC.
If you have no evidence now and then you have a process on the other side, how can you add this up together to make a logical case?