I probably spoke too quickly.
I just said that Global Affairs Canada's responsibility is to maintain a coherent foreign policy, while coordinating the trade and international development portfolios.
In that context, let me identify three subjects that I respectfully suggest merit the committee's attention.
The first is the level of funding. Global Affairs and its foreign service cannot succeed without resources commensurate with the breadth and significance of their mission. That means money to establish and maintain the presence of appropriate size, not only in capitals, but also at the busiest intersections of the multilateral world. It also means levels of development assistance that will earn us influence and credibility at the table. At present, in comparison with our key allies, we underinvest in both.
Secondly, GAC must open the doors. It cannot be a closed shop. It needs a diversity of views and the expertise of those beyond the department, whether in universities, in think tanks or in civil society. Bringing other voices in through consultations and secondments will enhance the department's ability to plan for over-the-horizon events. That might be done, for example, by returning to the former practice of organizing annual, multi-day consultations or by having standing advisory bodies.
Finally, there must be scope for boldness. Canada has in the past been seen on the international stage as a leading source of good ideas. We were among the most active in the establishment of the International Criminal Court. We led the process that resulted in the Ottawa Treaty to ban land mines. We introduced the human security agenda and made it a central part of the Security Council's work—when the council was working. That agenda included things that echo to this day: the protection of civilians; women, peace and security; children and armed conflict; and the responsibility to protect.
We are still uniquely positioned to show leadership by conceiving of and promoting fresh ideas and new thinking. There have been occasions in the recent past when we've done just that.
However, we can do much more. The department and its officials should be encouraged to imagine a leading role for Canada in devising new solutions to contemporary problems.
Mr. Chair, there are other important topics I could mention that will perhaps be raised during the committee's question period.
In particular, I can think of the need for effective sharing of information among GAC, security intelligence and defence; the urgency of strategic recruitment and lateral transfers to build the department of tomorrow; the importance of strengthening consular services; and showing leadership in international criminal justice and before the International Court of Justice.
Thank you again, Mr. Chair and members, for having invited me.
Thank you.